H-1B
Up-to-date information on wage-hour principles and developments from
Fisher & Phillips attorneys who focus their practices on these matters.

H-1B Employers Must Toe-The-Line

April 25, 2011 06:05
by Shanon R. Stevenson

The U.S. Labor Department continues to target non-compliance by employers using the H-1B program to employ foreign nationals to work in the U.S. in professional or specialty jobs.  Recent DOL audits have resulted in substantial assessments of back-wages and penalties.

An employer using the H-1B program must pay program employees a wage rate that is the greater of (1) the "actual wage" (the rate the employer pays to all others in the position with similar experience and qualifications), or (2) the "prevailing wage" (the wage rate DOL determines for the occupational classification in the area of employment).  The employer is also responsible for paying certain government-imposed filing fees.

This Time, Schools Are Hit

Earlier this month, DOL asserted claims of $4.2 million in back-wages and $1.7 million in civil money penalties against Maryland's Prince George's County Public Schools.  DOL contended that, by requiring 1,044 H-1B teachers to pay program filing fees, the Schools had in effect illegally and willfully reduced the teachers' wages below the legally-required wage rate.  DOL's position is that the employer must bear the expenses associated with obtaining H-1B visas.

Elsewhere, DOL recently sought $78,000 in back-pay from Global Teachers Research and Resources, Inc. for 22 teachers working on H-1B visas.  Global provides foreign teachers to school districts in Georgia, Florida, New Mexico, and South Carolina.  DOL concluded that Global failed both to keep accurate records of hours worked by the teachers and to pay them for their time spent in employer-provided training.

"I"s Dotted, "T"s Crossed?

Every organization employing foreign nationals on H-1B visas should immediately audit its policies and practices to ensure that it is complying with the H-1B program requirements.  Among other things, management should make sure that the organization:

• Pays H-1B employees the required wage listed on the Labor Condition Application ("LCA") and provides the same benefits to H-1B and U.S. workers;

• Diligently maintains and audits Public Access files for each H-1B worker;

• Promptly withdraws H-1Bs and LCAs when an H-1B worker is no longer employed;

• Pays the reasonable cost of the worker's return transportation to his or her home country if the employee is terminated before the end of the period shown on the H-1B; and

• Evaluates (or has counsel evaluate) any proposed material change in the worker's job description, work schedule, or wage rate to see whether the organization must file an amended H-1B petition.

Every organization that decides to file an H-1B petition should take a hands-on approach to this process.  For one thing, an H-1B petitioning employer must sign the application under penalty of perjury.  Management should be certain going in that it is fully aware of and understands all of its legal obligations as an H-1B applicant and employer.

 

◊   Have a comment or something else to add?  Please use our comment feature below.

Compliance | Government Enforcement | H-1B

USDOL Targeting H-1B Pay/Benefits Compliance

January 2, 2011 06:36
by Kim Kiel Thompson

The US Labor Department is aggressively investigating compliance with the wage-rate and benefits commitments employers must make in an H-1B Labor Condition Application (LCA). These investigations are usually triggered when an H-1B employee complains that the employer failed to pay the LCA wage.

The H-1B program allows foreign nationals to work in the US in professional or specialty jobs.  However, the employer must attest, among other things, that it will:

◊   Pay the H-1B employee at least the prevailing wage set by DOL based upon job duties and the employment location, and

◊   Offer the foreign worker benefits comparable to those offered to US workers in the same job classification.

DOL is taking these investigations very seriously and is assessing significant liability.  For example, under a December 2010 consent order, a software consulting company agreed to pay over $638,000 in back wages and interest for LCA violations.  The company and the owner also agreed to pay more than $126,000 in civil money penalties and interest for failing to provide the required LCA notice at each work site and for seeking a penalty from H-1B employees for terminating their employment early.  The company will be debarred for a year from participating in the H-1B program. 

During an investigation, DOL reviews information such as:

•   The contents of the LCA itself,

•   A statement of how the wage rate was set,

•   Documentation showing how the prevailing wage was established,

•   The original notices posted advising workers about the LCA filing,

•   A summary of the benefits offered to US workers in the same occupation,

•   Payroll records and dates of employment for the H-1B employee,

•   A copy of the H-1B petition filed with the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS),

•   Evidence that the employer notified USCIS if the H-1B employment was terminated prior to the end of the authorized period and that the LCA was withdrawn, and

•   The current or last-known address and contact information for all H-1B employees.

The investigation generally includes interviews with management officials and H-1B employees.

DOL's main goals are (i) to determine whether the employer paid each H-1B employee the LCA wage for the period the LCA remained in effect (liability for not doing so can continue even after the employee was no longer employed but the LCA was not withdrawn); and (ii) to ensure that H-1B employees' wages were not docked when they were ready, willing, and able to work but the employer did not permit them to do so.  If the investigator finds that the employer is in violation, DOL normally assesses liability for back-pay, any benefits shortfalls, interest, and civil money penalties.  DOL might also insist upon monitoring and auditing the company's compliance with H-1B requirements.  In serious cases, DOL might debar the employer from using the H-1B program.

Read more about USDOL, USCIS, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement audits in the January 2011 edition of our Labor Letter.

 

◊   Have a comment or something else to add?  Please use our comment feature below.

Compliance | Government Enforcement | H-1B

TAG CLOUD


No poll

Show Results
Copyright 2007-2013 Fisher & Phillips LLP disclaimer
navbottom image